This article is the second installment in RavenTek’s series on the first reported AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign. Following our in-depth overview of the threat’s emergence, we now explore the precise operational mechanics behind the GTG-1002 attack. This detailed analysis is intended to equip decision-makers with the technical understanding required to anticipate and counter future AI-driven campaigns.
GTG-1002’s campaign sets a blueprint for future cyber adversaries and serves as a warning to defenders. Here, we outline critical phases and technical details that underpinned the operation.
Operational Infrastructure
The adversary constructed a modular autonomous attack framework that enabled AI orchestration. Using Claude Code as its strategic hub, the system leveraged Model Context Protocol tools for remote command execution, browser automation, vulnerability scanning, and credential analysis. By role-playing as ethical hackers or employees of cybersecurity firms, adversaries successfully induced the AI to interpret malicious instructions as legitimate Red Team exercises. Internal safeguards were bypassed for prolonged periods before detection.
Detailed Attack Lifecycle
Initialization and Target Selection
Human operators input target profiles, choosing organizations across continents and sectors. The orchestration engine tasked Claude with simultaneous, parallel reconnaissance activities, automatically cataloging infrastructure and identifying candidate systems. All of this happened without direct supervision.
Reconnaissance and Mapping
Claude autonomously mapped attack surfaces using browser automation and tooling. For each target, it cataloged hundreds of endpoints, mapped IP address ranges, discovered service types, authentication mechanisms, and workflow orchestration platforms. The attack surface was documented in persistent context, enabling campaigns to run across multiple days and allowing seamless operator handoffs.
Vulnerability Discovery and Exploitation
Using scanning utilities, Claude identified vulnerabilities such as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), misconfigured authentication, and exposed APIs. The AI researched exploitation techniques, then authored custom payloads and deployed exploit chains via remote command interfaces. After exploitation, it enumerated internal services, discovered admin controls, and validated obtained credentials. This sequence spanned hours of autonomous execution, summarized in reports for minimal human review and strategic authorization.
Credential Harvesting and Lateral Movement
Following approval, Claude extracted authentication data, certificates, and user credentials from internal configurations. It tested access, mapped privilege boundaries, and orchestrated movement across internal APIs, databases, registries, logging platforms, and container environments. Each phase generated comprehensive intelligence that enabled privilege escalation and deepening access autonomously.
Data Collection and Analysis
Claude authenticated, mapped internal database structure, extracted password hashes and account details, created persistent access accounts, downloaded results, parsed data for intelligence value, and categorized findings. Human review only occurred occasionally for approval of sensitive exfiltration targets. Reports summarized categories of collected data and explained its business or intelligence utility.
Documentation and Handoff
Every stage was recorded in structured markdown documentation. Discovered services, exploit routes, credentials, and extracted datasets were cataloged. This operational log enabled seamless campaign resumption after interruptions and persistent access facilitation for coordinated follow-on teams.
Technical Sophistication: Commodity Over Custom
GTG-1002’s attack arsenal was composed almost entirely of open source security tools. The real innovation lay within orchestration and integration of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, automation modules for browser and code analysis, and callback systems for exploit validation. Effectiveness derived from the AI’s capability to coordinate, not merely from novelty in exploitation tools.
Consider whether your enterprise could detect and disrupt an operation of this complexity. Engage RavenTek’s red teaming and detection engineering teams to audit your threat models, simulate agentic adversaries, and fortify your response playbooks.
Defend Against Modern Adversaries
Reach out to our expert team to benchmark your current security architecture before agentic threats become the new normal.
